Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Health is Easy to Reach - Know Before You Decide

 
Medicine is to heal from the inside

Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patient

Introduction
Heart failure is the inability of the heart to perfuse metabolizing tissues adequately. The most common cause of this is myocardial failure, which can be caused by a wide variety of disease states.

Our body depends on the heart's pumping action to deliver oxygen- and nutrient-rich blood to the body's cells. When the cells are nourished properly, the body can function normally. With heart failure, the weakened heart can't supply the cells with enough blood. This results in fatigue and shortness of breath. Everyday activities such as walking, climbing stairs or carrying groceries can become very difficult.

heart failure
adopted from http://www.covenantheartinstitute.com/default

Heart failure is a serious condition, and usually there's no cure. But many people with heart failure lead a full, enjoyable life when the condition is managed with medications and healthy lifestyle changes. It's also helpful to have the support of family and friends who understand your condition.

Epidemiology
Most patients have heart failure at their older age. And leads to frequent of hospitalization in people older than 65. About 5 million people in USA are affected by heart failure and about 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. What is of more concern is that more than 50% of patients seek re-admission within 6 months after treatment and the average duration of hospital stay is 6 days.


The common causes of heart failure include heart attacks and other forms of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Heart failure can cause a number of symptoms including shortness of breath (typically worse when lying flat, which is called universally agreed definition and challenges in definitive diagnosis. Treatment orthopnea), coughing, chronic venous congestion, ankle swelling, and exercise intolerance. Heart failure is often undiagnosed due to a lack of a commonly consists of lifestyle measures (such as decreased salt intake) and medications, and sometimes devices or even surgery.

Until recently, lifestyle changes, medication and, sometimes, heart surgery were the only treatment options. Patients with severe symptoms, however, received little, if any, relief from such approaches. To make matters worse, up to 40 percent of patients with CHF also have an arrhythmia that further reduces the heart’s ability to beat properly.

Cardiac Resynchronization Device
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an innovative new therapy
that can relieve CHF symptoms by improving the coordination of
the heart’s contractions.CRT builds on the technology used in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter devices. CRT devices also can protect the patient from slow and fast heart rhythms.

The concept behind CRT is quite simple. Resynchronization restores the normal coordinated pumping action of the ventricles by overcoming the delay in electrical conduction caused by bundle branch block. This is accomplished by means of a special type of cardiac device. These powerful, “built-in” devices have enormous potential to improve the quality of life and probably survival for patients with heart failure.

Pacemakers are typically used to prevent symptoms due to an excessively
slow heartbeat. The pacemaker continuously monitors the heartbeat
and, when necessary, delivers tiny, imperceptible electrical signals to
stimulate the heartbeat. Most pacemakers have two electrode wires,
or leads, one in the right atrium and one in the right ventricle. This
ensures the pacemaker will maintain the normal coordinated pumping
relationship between the upper and lower chambers of the heart.

The wires that carry the electrical signals connect to an electrical pulse
generator placed under the skin in the upper chest. In addition to the
two leads (right atrium and right ventricle) used by a common pacemaker,
the CRT device has a third lead that is positioned in a vein on the surface of the left ventricle.
dual chamber cardiac resynchronization device
adopted from http://www.medicalproductguide.com/

This allows the CRT device to simultaneously stimulate the left and right ventricles and restore a coordinated, or “synchronous,” squeezing pattern. This is sometimes referred to as “bi-ventricular pacing” because both ventricles are electrically stimulated (paced) at the same time. This reduces the electrical delay and results in a more coordinated and effective heart beat.

Outcome of CRT
Canadian researchers report that an implantable device called a resynchronization therapy-defibrillator helps keep the left side of the heart pumping properly, extending the life of heart failure patients. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy, or CRT-D, also reduces heart failure symptoms, such as edema (swelling) and shortness of breath, as well as hospitalizations for some patients with moderate to severe heart failure, the scientists added.

People who are receiving good medical therapy and resynchronization therapy as well, are shown to stay out of the hospital and live longer than none. The report is published in the Nov. 14 online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy alone or together with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has previously been shown to reduce mortality and hospitalizations in patients with moderate to severe heart failure.

Combined medical therapy and device therapy for patients with mild, moderate and severe heart failure can substantially improve survival and reduce the likelihood of hospitalization. The cumulative benefits offered to heart failure patients by evidence-based medication and device-based therapies are truly remarkable.

Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
89
Vote
   


Percutaneus Coronary Disease vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Severe Coronary Artery Disease

Background
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has risen world consent about it. Since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. According to WHO data, it's estimated about 17.5 millions people die from CVD annually.

Coronary artery disese causing severe morbidity and poor quality of life since limitation of activities, pain, long-term care. There are many modalities in treatment for coronary artery disease, such as PCI and CABG. Both of them aims at improving coronary blood flow and prevention of recurrent heart attack.

Coronary-artery bypass grafting has became the standard of care for symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease since its introduction in 1968. Recent advances and innovation in coronary surgery e.g., off-pump CABG, smaller incisions, enhanced myocardial preservation, use of arterial conduits, and improved postoperative care have reduced morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft occlusion.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was introduced in 1977. This approach has been developed in technology, has made it possible to treat increasingly complex lesions and patients with a history of clinically significant cardiac disease, risk factors for coronary artery disease, coexisting conditions, or anatomical risk factors.
PCI procedure
adopted from http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Health/2007/7-10-04-Angioplasty.htm

Several trials has been done to compare efficacy of bare-stents PCI with CABG in patients with multivessel disease. The results showed similar survival rates but higher re-intervention rates among patients with bare-metal stents at 5 years duration. Some researchs have shown a significant long-term survival advantage with surgical approach.

New technique PCI, with drug-eluting, using anti cell-proliferation agents such as Taxus, has been developed. Randomized trials comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents have shown significant reductions in the
rate of repeat intervention, with similar rates of death and myocardial infarction. These data is used as a base line for expanding PCI usage in patients with complex coronary anatomical features, though most randomized trials such patients.
According to current guidelines, CABG remains the treatment of choice for patients with severe coronary artery disease, including those with left main coronary artery disease and those with three-vessel disease.

Since, widely used of PCI in severe case of Coronary artery disease with lack of evidence. There is needed to do systematic comparison between PCI and CABG. The results of the trials perhaps can be used as basic for choosing proper treatment for the patients. Or The Right Treatment for The Right Patients

Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial, researchers assessed the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with
previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease and defined the populations of patients for whom only one revascularization
method will be effective.
CABG procedure
adopted from http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/cs/pat/cardiac/cabg.html

Summary of trials
The SYNTAX trial was designed as a noninferiority trial with the primary endpoint of death, stroke myocardial infarction (MI), or repeat evascularization at 12 months. The study planned to evaluate the outcome of the subgroup of patients with three-vessel or left main separately if the overall trial demonstrated noninferiority.

The study showed that PCI is associated with higher re-intervention procedures rates compare with CABG group. However, the rates of death and heart attack were not different between two group. While stroke is higher in CABG group compare with PCI.

Although this is not an expected result, further analysis showed that the extent of disease was an important factor, as those with the most complex coronary disease did better with CABG, while those with an intermediate or low scores showed similar outcomes between the groups.

Take Home Message
With the recent 5 year follow up study after procedures, the result showed that LM Stenting is still showing equivalent in mortality, the results may shift balance more toward to PCI. But, CABG is associated with lower re-intervention procedures compare with PCI..

By the way, in subgroup analysis PCI-with drug-eluting showed significant efficacy in patient with Left-Main Artery disease or same outcome with CABG. There will be endless debate on this issue, but PCI will be preferred and most utilized therapy for unprotected left-main lesions in the future. Meanwhile, the treatment decisions should be individualized and clinically relevant, with careful informed consent before making a choice.
Endless Debate
adopted from http://evolution.berkeley.edu

The higher stroke rate in CABG is also an important concern for patients undergoing CABG and should impact patient selection. Importantly, the two groups showed no difference in death, cardiac death, or MI. But the SYNTAX has limitation due to its only 1 year follow up, compare the others research such MAIN-COMPARE trial about 5 year follow up.
But, from this data, we can keep in our mind that patient selection and the extent of the disease, patient preference, complications of the procedures are important factor in determining treatment choice.

Comments (1)Comments (1) Add CommentsAdd Comments
71
Vote
   


Dual Inhibiton: New Strategy for Lowering Cholesterol

Intro
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has risen world consent about it. Since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. According to WHO data, it's estimated about 17.5 millions people die from CVD annually.

The pathogenesis of CVD has been welll-known as the process that involving progressive cholesterol deposits in vessels that causing decreased in vessels lumen diameters. Disruption in developed cholesterol plaque may promotes thrombosis events that lead to distal perfused organ damaged, for example heart attack, stroke and perifer arterial disease.
Cardiology issues
adopted from http://www.gbscorp.com

The process and progressivity of atherosclerosis is depend on several risk factors, includes high level of low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol as demonstrated in many trials.

Comprehensive management of CVD involves combined intervention of lifestyle and medication therapy.
Many studies have demonstrated association between LDL-C and progression of CVD, and those findings are positive linear correlation between LDL-C and CVD. Thus, implicate in treatment of CVD patient.

"Increasing number of age is impossible to avoid, but perhaps we can slow or retard the degenerative process." This has become major treatment goals and motivation for scientists to look any other possibilities in treatment.

Cholesterol lowering therapy
Cholesterol control, especially LDL-C control has become popular in medical field. And becoming one of treatment modalities for CVD.
Lowering serum cholesterol levels reduces the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD)-related events.
Cholesterol Cartoon
adopted from http://www.glasbergen.com

National and international guideline for the prevention of CHD recommend the modification of lipid profiles and particularly LDL-C. Several clinical trials indicated an added benefit from aggressive lipid lowering LDL-C levels. Based on these findings NCEP ATP III revised the LDL-C target from <100 mg/dl to 70 mg/dl for very high risk patients. Unfortunately, result from REALITY-Asia study. for across all cardiovascular risk categories, only 48% of patients attained ATP III targets for LDL-C.

Statins are commonly prescribed as first line treatment but many patients at high-risk for CHD still fail to reach their cholesterol or low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) goals with statin monotherapy.

For patients who fail to achieve their LDL-C target, inhibiting two main sources of cholesterol synthesis and uptake -- can produce more effective lipid lowering, allowing more patients to reach their LDL-C goal. Ezetimibe is a highly-selective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption and simvastatin is an evidence based inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis.

The 23% additional reduction in LDL-cholesterol seen with ezetimibe added to ongoing statin monotherapy compares favorably with the 6% to 8% reduction usually seen when the dose of the original statin is doubled, Dr. Pearson commented. The results of EASE study suggest that the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy should be considered in patients who have not achieved their NCEP ATP III goal on statin therapy alone.
Degenerative process in vessels
adopted from http://www.diabetesmonitor.com

Recently, SEAS trial has reported that the combination of ezetimibe/simvastatin was associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer compare to placebo, causing widespread public concern. But based on post marketing analysis by dr. Alawi et al, that adverse event in SEAS trial doesn't support that ezetimibe alone or in combination with simvastatin increase the risk of cancer.

I think based on those trials, dual therapy on cholesterol lowering should be applicated in medical practice. Ezetimibe (absorption inhibitor) and Statin (production inhibitor) are promising combination in cholesterol control.
Comments (2)Comments (2) Add CommentsAdd Comments
77
Vote
   


Stem Cells May Improve Heart Bypass Results

Is That True?
On Nov 17th 2008, German Researchers publish their result of their studies.
They said that Patients who received bone marrow stem cell transplants during coronary bypass surgery (CABG) experienced "excellent long-term safety and survival


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
76
Vote
   


yulius hermanto's Blogs

218 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Moderated by yulius hermanto
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]